As the Barry Bonds Trial Begins, A Threshold Question Remains

After years of delays and appeals, Barry Bonds’ criminal trial for allegedly lying to a federal grand jury will begin on Monday.
 
Now, it may take some serious time to get a jury picked in the case. How many people in the Bay Area have not formed an opinion of Bonds and his alleged steroid use? Maybe the court can find 12 A’s fans who don’t read the news?

Anyway, the threshold question for the Bonds trial is whether 52 equals 1?

We know, once again, that Bonds’ trainer and presumed steroids mastermind, Greg Anderson, will not testify for the prosecution and will remain in jail. Without the benefit of Anderson’s critical testimony, the prosecution may call 52 other witnesses to fill in the blanks. The government will call former players, Bonds’ personal assistant and even his old girl friend to present mostly circumstantial evidence of his guilt.

While the amount of evidence from multiple sources can be compelling, the prosecutors will be left to wonder how strong their case would have been if they had the one person who could testify that he gave Bonds steroids, Bonds knew what he was taking, and he lied to a grand jury about it. That testimony and that testimony alone, would be sufficient proof beyond a reasonable doubt to gain a conviction of the home run champ.

 
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.sportsinthecourtsblog.com/admin/trackback/243221
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.