The Penn State Scandal: Is Sandusky's Defense Hinting at a Desire for an Eventual Plea?
Today, before the national media, Jerry Sandusky's defense attorney told the world that his client was innocent and he was going to "fight like hell." So why didn't they?
Instead of going through with a preliminary hearing on whether the prosecution had probable cause to charge Sandusky with the crimes in the indictment, the defense waived the hearing and decided to proceed directly to trial. In the news conference that Attorney Joseph Amadola appeared to be enjoying, he stated that the hearing was waived because the defense could not fully attack a witnesses credibility in this type of limited hearing. Amadola also said that the defense waived the hearing for public relations reasons of not having these horrible allegations repeated, on a national stage, against Sandusky.
Well, "public relations" concerns are not a very sound defense strategy. In cases that hinge on the credibility of witnesses (especially from years back), a defense attorney wants as much testimony as possible. The defense attorney wants the prosecution's witnesses to tell their stories, on the record, over and over again. Remember, no one tells a story the exact same way twice. If Sandusky has a chance for an acquittal, his defense team needs to exploit inconsistencies in critical witnesses' accounts. A good defense attorney will use these inconsistencies, however minor or benign, to create reasonable doubt in the minds of a juror.
Yet, today, the defense bypassed this golden opportunity to get more inconsistent statements on the record. Forget about "winning" the preliminary hearing, the object of the game is to build an arsenal for the defense at trial. Since the defense gave this up, is the real truth about the strategy something else?
We heard a relieved prosecutor state that he was pleased that the complainants were not "re-victimized" today. In my experience as a prosecutor, this suggests that the defense wants (or may want) something in return. The eventual trade off here may be a more favorable plea deal for Sandusky.
My name is Christopher Fusco. I am the managing partner of Callahan & Fusco, LLC with offices in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.